SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Ranjana Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jaspinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate, Mr. Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate, Mr. Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate, Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Narain Raina, J.

1. This order will dispose of FAO Nos. 3934 and 1088 of 2013 as the same arise out of a common award dated 15th December, 2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala.

2. FAO No. 3934 of 2013 has been filed by the claimants/appellants seeking enhancement in the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The claimants/appellants in this appeal are the widow, two daughters and one son of late Kewal Krishan who died on the spot in a fatal road accident. FAO No. 1088 of 2013 has been filed by the Jaspinder Singh, driver and Haneet Jakhar, owner of the offending vehicle for setting aside the award passed by the Tribunal.

3. A few facts may be noticed. Deceased Krishan Kumar along with his younger brother was on way towards Baldev Nagar on foot on the left side of the road towards their house in village Mandhaur. When they reached near a Seat Cover factory on the Ambala-Chandigarh highway, a Toyota Innova bearing Registration No.CH-03U-0477 driven by Jaspinder Singh at highway speed came from the side of Chandigarh and crushed Krishan Kumar veeri







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top