SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RITU BAHRI
Lakhwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Naveen Daryal.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Gaur.

JUDGMENT :

RITU BAHRI, J.

1. The petitioner is seeking quashing of the order dated 24.10.2002 (Annexure P-4), whereby his claim for grant of higher standard pay scale as per ACP Rules, has been rejected.

2. On 10.11.1978, Lakhwant Singh-petitioner joined the respondent-department as conductor on regular basis through employment exchange. His services were dispensed with on 06.04.1979. He filed a demand notice in the Labour Court, whereupon the respondents had taken him back in service on 04.12.1979. He was again terminated on 21.11.1980. He filed second demand notice before the Labour Court under Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act. Consequent upon the compromise effected between the parties before the Lok Adalat on 02.06.2000, he was reinstated vide order dated 19.06.2000 passed by the General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Kaithal. However, he was not given the back wages, including annual increment for the period he remained out of service.

3. After reinstatement, the petitioner made repeated requests to the respondents to grant him the benefit of 1st and 2nd ACP under the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998. Thereafter, the petitioner filed CWP No. 12








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top