SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

INDERJIT SINGH
Bhupender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manju Aggarwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Inderjit Singh, J.

CRM-10079-2016

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 32 days in filing the application seeking leave to appeal, is condoned.

CRM-A-607-MA-2016

Applicant-Bhupender Singh has filed this application under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, 'Cr.P.C.') seeking permission for leave to appeal against respondent-Manju Aggarwal, challenging the impugned judgment dated 23.12.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rohtak, in criminal complaint No.378 dated 17.05.2013, titled as 'Bhupender Singh v. Manju Aggarwal' filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, 'N.I.Act') vide which the respondent-accused was acquitted.

2. It is mainly stated in the application that accompanying appeal is being filed which is likely to succeed on the grounds taken therein. It is further stated that the impugned judgment passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rohtak, acquitting the respondent under Section 138 of the N.I.Act, suffers from illegality and irregularity and thus the same deserves to be set aside. It is, therefore, prayed that leave to appeal may be








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top