SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Kunal Garg – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Pankaj Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

G.S. Sandhawalia, J.

The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing notice dated 07.06.2012 (Annexure P-4), issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitization & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity, the 'SARFAESI Act') and notice dated 07.11.2012 (Annexure P-7), wherein the authorised officer of the respondent-Bank called upon the petitioner to deliver possession of the secured assets on or after 08.12.2012.

2. The pleaded case of the petitioner is that the petitioner stood as guarantor for securing loan sanctioned to respondent No.3 by mortgaging property measuring 16 kanals 6-1/9 marla situated at Village Gill Patti, Tehsil and District Bhatinda, which was agricultural land on which popular trees were planted and wheat crops had been sown.

3. Respondent No.3, M/s D.G.Exports had been sanctioned the fund based limit (FBL) of Rs. 50 lacs and the foreign letter of credit (FLC) of Rs.1800 lacs. The property had also been mortgaged in favour of the Bank to secure the credit facilities to M/s S.N. Oversees which was a proprietorship concern of M/s Neeru Garg.

4. Coun





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top