SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 2331

K.KANNAN
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant :Bhim Sen Sehgal, Advocate
For Respondents: Kesav Gupta, A.A.G.

JUDGMENT

K. Kannan, J.

1. The petitioner is before this court seeking for review of the respondent/State's decision to deny her claim for ex-gratia payment announced by the Haryana Government through its instructions dated 20.9.1999 for the families of defence forces, who died in any action or warlike engagement, which is specifically notified by the Ministry of Defence, Government of India. The petitioner's husband died along with 17 other on 28.12.2001 at Laungewala in a mine accident while "harbouring and arming" and reported as battle casualty to the Indian army (AGORG) by Indian Army (ADP Centre). The casualty report forwarded to Secretary Zila Sainik Board, Ambala, also reports the death as a battle casualty who died "in mine blast in OP Parakram on 28.12.2001 in Laungewala sector". When a claim was made, the State referred to its own scheme to decline the plea and cited the persons who are not eligible under the scheme, as stipulated in terms of eligibility in Annexure B attached to the notification. The State counsel would refer to me the particularly clause which would apply to the petitioner, which reads as under:-

"Those who are not eligible

1. xx xx xx

2. Physical Causalitie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top