Sushil vs State of Haryana - 2019 Supreme(P&H) 845

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 845

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Sushil – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Atul Pratap Dhankar, Adv., Bijender Dhankar, Adv., Anmol Malik, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. Appellants have assailed correctness and validity of judgment of conviction passed by Additional Session Judge, Sonipat in a criminal case arising out of FIR No.402 dated 11.10.2014 registered under Sections 186, 353, 307, 34 IPC and 25 of Arms Act, sentencing appellants in the following manner:-

Name of the accused	Offence U/s	Period of sentence (RI)	Fine imposed	Period of sentence in default of payment of fine
Sushil and Ramesh	307 IPC	10 years each	Rs.20,000/- each	One year each
353 IPC	2 years each	Rs.5,000/- each	Three months each
25 Arms Act	3 year each	Rs.5,000/- each	Three months each

2. Case of the prosecution as noticed in the impugned judgment is extracted as under:-

"2. The brief facts of the present case are that on 11.10.2014, ASI Hari Om alongwith ASI Dharambir, HC Naveen, Constable Sanjay, Constable Anil and Constable Vinit was present at Kami Road Beypass T-point for election patrolling duty in Government vehicle bearing registration No.HR 45B-1008 being driven by its driver C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 845

ANIL KSHETARPALSushil – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Sushil – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent