SHEKHER DHAWAN
Hem Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shekher Dhawan, J.
1. Present petition is for quashing of FIR No. 110 dated 20.04.2017, under Sections 309, 447, 427, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station City Barnala, District Barnala, on the basis of compromise dated 18.11.2018 (Annexure P2).
2. Learned counsel for the parties have stated that the present FIR may be quashed as the parties have amicably settled the dispute.
3. During the course of preliminary hearing, the trial Court was directed to record the statements of all the concerned parties, with regard to the genuineness and validity or otherwise of the compromise by this Court.
4. In compliance thereof, report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barnala, has been received through District and Sessions Judge, Barnala, with statement of parties, in which, it has been mentioned that the compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side.
5. The Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in case Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, (2007) 3 RCR (Cri) 1052 and Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in case Sube Singh and Another vs. State of Haryana and Another, (2013) 4 RCR (Cri) 102 observed that compounding of offence can be allowed ev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.