Lalit vs State Of Haryana - 2019 Supreme(P&H) 976

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 976

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Lalit – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Ghai, Adv., Kanika Ahuja, Adv., A.P.S. Deol, Adv., H.S. Deol, Adv., Deepender Singh, Adv., J.S. Bedi, Adv., Sunil Sihag, Adv., Shubhra Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the instant seven appeals, therefore, these are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. These appeals are instituted against judgment dated 30.01.2017 and order dated 31.01.2017, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, in Sessions Case No. 05 of 2013, dated 01.11.2013. Initially, the appellants along with co-accused Anil alias Bhola were charged with for the offences punishable under Sections 148/302 read with Section 149/120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Subsequently, additional charge for commission of offences punishable under Sections 420/468/471 IPC was also framed against them. Vide the impugned judgment and order, the appellants were convicted and sentenced as under :-

Sections	Sentence
U/s 120-B IPC read with sections 302/148/ 420/468/471 IPC.	Rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.50,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for two years.
U/s 149 IPC read with sections

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 976

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHULalit – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Lalit – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent