SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 981

KULDIP SINGH
Veena Aneja – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Bashamboo, Adv., Deepak Suri, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Kuldip Singh, J.

Veena Aneja- deceased, now through her legal heirs, has filed the present appeal for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short 'the Tribunal) vide award dated 2.8.2000.

2. Facts of the case are that Veena Aneja, aged about 44 years, who was working in Command Hospital, Chandimandir, after performing her duties was coming back on her scooter No. CH-01-S-0789 on 5.1.1996. At about 3.45 p.m., when she crossed the railway lights point and was approaching Chandigarh, respondent No. 1-Raj Kumar came from behind driving Maruti Van bearing registration No. PB-37-1707 rashly and negligently and struck against her scooter. As a result of the said accident, Veena Aneja fell down and received multiple injuries including head injury. She was removed to PGI Chandigarh where she remained admitted from 5.1.1996 to 2.6.1996. She was operated upon four times. She slipped into vegetative state. She was declared 100% disabled by the doctors. She was unable to eat, drink, hear, talk or understand anything. She had no

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top