SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1108

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Inderpal @ Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manoj Tanwar, Adv., Shubhra Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.

1. This appeal is instituted against the judgment and order dated 07.03.2018/09.03.2018 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mewat in Sessions Case No.529 of 2015 whereby the appellant, who was charged with and tried for offence punishable under Section 201, 302, 364, 392 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC'), has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

Offence U/S

Rigorous Imprisonment

Fine

302 IPC

Imprisonment for Life

Rs.80,000/-

364 IPC

Ten years

Rs.20,000/-

395 IPC

Five years

Rs.10,000/-

120-B IPC

Imprisonment for Life

Rs.5,000/-

In default of payment of fine, the appellant is to undergo further imprisonment for a period of one year. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The other co-accused namely Dalip, Rahul Puri and Vijay @Neeraj were declared as juveniles and sent to the Juvenile Justice Board for trial.

3. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell is that on 22.03.2015 one Samsuddin son of Bagdal resident of Padheni, P.S. Tau

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top