JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

1. This appeal is instituted against the judgment dated 26.03.2018 and order dated 27.03.2018 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, in Sessions Case RBT no. 116 dated 05.09.2016/27.10.2017 whereby the appellant was charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) and under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short ‘POCSO Act’). He has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

He was acquitted under Sections 363 and 366A IPC.

2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that on 31.01.2016 complainant Sugreev son of Ram Adhar filed a complaint before Incharge, Police Station Sector 55, Faridabad. According to the contents of the complaint, he had five daughters and one son. His daughter/prosecutrix was doing the job of helper at plot no. 451, Sect