SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1146

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Prince Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
S.S. Rana, Harpreet Kaur, Devender Arya.

JUDGMENT :

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

CRM No. 39102 of 2018 in CRR No. 3677 of 2018

1. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 114 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned.

Application is allowed.

CRM No. 34504 of 2018 in CRR No. 3262 of 2018

2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 121 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned.

Application is allowed.

3. Main CASES

By this order, CRR Nos. 3677, 3262, 2001 and 2358 of 2018 (four revisions petitions) shall stand disposed of. All these revision petitions have been filed against judgment of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and order of sentence passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula sentencing petitioners to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year in two separate complaints with respect to separate cheques between the same parties bearing different dates. Sentence awarded to run consecutively. Two appeals were preferred by the convicts-petitioners whereas two appeals were preferred by the complainant-victim for enhancement of the sentence awarded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top