ANIL KSHETARPAL
Prince Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
CRM No. 39102 of 2018 in CRR No. 3677 of 2018
1. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 114 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned.
Application is allowed.
CRM No. 34504 of 2018 in CRR No. 3262 of 2018
2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 121 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned.
Application is allowed.
3. Main CASES
By this order, CRR Nos. 3677, 3262, 2001 and 2358 of 2018 (four revisions petitions) shall stand disposed of. All these revision petitions have been filed against judgment of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and order of sentence passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula sentencing petitioners to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year in two separate complaints with respect to separate cheques between the same parties bearing different dates. Sentence awarded to run consecutively. Two appeals were preferred by the convicts-petitioners whereas two appeals were preferred by the complainant-victim for enhancement of the sentence awarded.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.