SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1314

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Mohd Hanif – Appellant
Versus
Mohd Indress – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunny K. Singla, Adv., G.S. Bhatia, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Raj Mohan Singh, J.

Petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.09.2017 passed by executing Court and judgment dated 12.12.2017 passed by Additional District Judge, Sangrur vide which third party objections filed by the petitioners were dismissed concurrently.

2. Perusal of the record would show that in a suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 against respondent Nos.2 to 6, an alternative decree for recovery was passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Malerkotla vide judgment and decree dated 21.01.2011.

3. An appeal was preferred by the plaintiff himself before the Lok Adalat presided over by Additional District Judge, Sangrur. A compromise was effected between the parties before the Lok Adalat. On the basis of compromise, trial Court decree was modified. Appeal was allowed and suit for specific performance was decreed on the basis of agreement to sell dated 21.02.2003. Respondents were restrained from executing the sale deed in favour of any other person except the plaintiff. The award was passed. Plaintiff was held entitled to get the sale deed executed from the respondents as per terms and conditions of the agreement to sell dated 21.02.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top