Raja vs State Of Haryana - 2019 Supreme(P&H) 1330

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1330

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Raja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Keshav Partap Singh, Adv., Kuldip Singh, Adv., Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both these appeals, i.e. CRA-D-484-DB of 2017 and CRA-D-860-DB of 2017, therefore, these are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. Both these appeals are directed against judgment dated 30.01.2017 and order dated 08.02.2017, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon. Appellants Raja and Azad alias Ismail along with co-accused Arif were charged with and tried for the offences punishable under Section 120-B, 452 and 326-A read with Section 34 IPC. Appellant

Azad alias Ismail was convicted and sentenced as under :-

Offence	Sentence
Section 452 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for three months.
Under Section 326-A IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for two years.
Under Section 120-B IPC (for hatching conspiracy to commit offence under Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1330

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHURaja – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Raja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent