RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Balwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sinderpal Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Family Court, Barnala dated 2.3.2017 by which suit filed by both the respondents under Order 33 Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short 'the CPC'] in forma pauperis for recovery of maintenance under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 [for short 'the Act'], by creating a charge over the property of the appellant and for permanent injunction restraining the appellant from alienating the suit property owned by him in any manner was decreed only qua respondent No.2/plantiff No.2 in the suit as plaintiff No.1/respondent No.1 had withdrawn the suit and the Family Court, Barnala had directed the recovery of maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month from the defendant/appellant by plaintiff No.2 by creating a charge over the suit property and also restraining him from alienating the suit property in any manner.
2. In brief, respondent No.1 & 2/plaintiff No.1 & 2 filed a suit in forma pauperis under Order 33 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC for recovery of maintenance amount of Rs.10,000/- per month for plaintiff No.1/respondent No.1 and Rs.5000/- per month for p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.