HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Daya Ram – Appellant
Versus
Pragati Enterprises – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J.
This order shall dispose of the above-noted petitions as identical questions of law and fact are involved therein.
2. The above noted petitions have been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the complaint cases No.32100 dated 02.03.2013, No.32105 dated 02.03.2013, No.32102 dated 02.03.2013, No.32101 dated 02.03.2013, No.32103 dated 02.03.2013, No.32104 dated 02.03.2013 and No.32106 dated 02.03.2013, respectively, all titled as 'M/s Pragati Enterprises vs. M/s K.K.Tanners & Ors.”, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as 'N.I.Act') read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jalandhar, alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
3. However, for the facility of reference, the facts are being taken from CRM-M-39632-2015.
4. The facts of the case are that complainant-M/s Pragati Enterprises through its proprietor Pardeep Shukla (now respondent) filed a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I.Act, against M/s K.K.Tanners, Girdhari Lal and Daya Ram (petitioner herein) with the averments that the complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.