HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.
1. In the present writ petition, the grievance which is being raised by the petitioner is against order dated 11.12.2014 (Annexure P-9) by which, the benefit of 3rd ACP granted to the petitioner, has been withdrawn. Further challenge is also to the order dated 12.01.2015 (Annexure P-10) vide which the pay of the petitioner has been refixed and recovery amounting to Rs.32,229/- has been made, being contrary to the law.
2. Further prayer of the petitioner is to step up the pay of the petitioner equivalent to his junior Sh. Wazir Singh, who was getting higher pay then the petitioner, which is impermissible keeping in view the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.3250 of 2006 titled as Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Haryana and others Vs. Ram Sarup Ganda and others, decided on 02.08.2006, read with the instructions dated 27.01.2015 issued by the Government of Haryana.
3. The facts as stated in the writ petition are that the petitioner was recruited on the post of Dak Runner on 17.12.1976. He was further promoted as a Daftri w.e.f. 23.01.1980 and thereafter, as a Clerk on 24.11.1982. On the basis of senio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.