State of Haryana vs Ashok - 2019 Supreme(P&H) 1536

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1536

RAJIV SHARMA, GURVINDER SINGH GILL
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Ashok – Respondent

Advocates Appeaerd:Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sunny Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant (convict) in CRA-D-15 of 2019.
Mr. Vishal Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral).:- Since common questions of law and facts are involved in and CRA-D-15 of 2019, therefore, these are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. Murder Reference No. 1 of 2019 has been made by learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court for Heinous Crime Against Women, Hisar, for confirmation of death sentence awarded to Ashok son of Suresh Kumar, resident of Juglan, Tehsil and District Hisar, vide judgment dated 29.11.2018 and order dated 05.12.2018, rendered in Sessions Case No. RBT/64-C dated 07.06.2017.

3. Criminal Appeal No. D-15 of 2019 has been preferred by appellant Ashok against the judgment dated 29.11.2018 and order dated 05.12.2018.

4. The appellant (convict) was charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 201, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’). He was convicted and sentenced as under :-

Name of the convict	Offence	Imprisonment	Fine	In default of payment of fine
Ashok	302 IPC	Death Sentence	-	-
	201 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1536

RAJIV SHARMA, GURVINDER SINGH GILLState of Haryana – AppellantVersusAshok – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

RAJIV SHARMA, GURVINDER SINGH GILL
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Ashok – Respondent