SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2898

RITU BAHRI
Mukesh Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeaerd:- Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Tanuj Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4.

JUDGMENT

Ms. Ritu Bahri, J (Oral):- By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing impugned order dated 11.3.2016 (P.4) passed by respondent No.2 whereby the entire family pension of husband of the petitioner namely Zile Singh has been awarded to respondent Nos.3 & 4 being unmarried daughters from his first wife (since deceased).

2. In the present case, this Court while issuing notice of motion on 07.4.2016 stayed the payment of pension to the extent of 50%. The claim of the petitioner qua family pension of her husband-late ASI Zile Singh has been considered and rejected vide order (P.4). It has come on record that said Zile Singh expired on 17.6.2012 and vide order dated 30.3.2015 (P.1) the petitioner-Mukesh Devi was granted Succession Certificate. It has also come on record vide Annexure P.4, Smt Chetna, second wife of late ASI Zile Singh was held entitled for complete pension being guardian of two remaining unmarried daughters till they reached the age of 25 years or till their marriage as per rule and thereafter family pension would have to be released in favour of the petitioner.

3. I have h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top