LISA GILL
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chanderwati alias Suman Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Lisa Gill, J.:- The petitioner/tenant is aggrieved of judgment dated 12.04.2018 passed by Appellate Authority, Faridabad, whereby judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by Rent Controller, Faridabad has been set aside. Rent petition filed by the respondent/landlord was dismissed but the learned Appellate Authority while setting aside the said decision has ordered eviction of the petitioner/tenant from the demised premises.
2. Brief facts as narrated in the petition filed by the landlord under Section 13 of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 are that the demised premises i.e. the shop in question was taken on lease on 01.01.1973 by the present petitioner Vinod Kumar on a monthly rent of Rs.125/- which was later enhanced to Rs.145/-. Earlier, a petition seeking eviction of the petitioner/tenant filed by respondent No.1 was allowed by the learned Rent Controller on 08.06.1984. Appeal preferred by the present petitioner was also dismissed on 06.12.1984. Revision petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 25.01.1985. However, the matter was compromised during the pendency of Special Leave Petition before Hon’ble the Supreme Court. Petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.