RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Irshad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J. - This judgment dispose of the aforesaid six appeals.
2. These appeals have been instituted against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 06/10.10.2017 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Rewari in Sessions Case No.21 of 2016, wherein, the appellants were charged with and tried for offences under Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149 IPC. They have been convicted and sentenced to undergo RI for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo RI for a period of ten months. Besides, appellant-Pawan has also been convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo RI for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.
3. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that on 22.04.2016 when ASI Ramkishan and EHC Om Parkash were present for patrolling duty at 75 feet road then they received a telephonic information regarding murder of a boy by few persons in village Maheshwari. On receiving this information ASI Ramkishan alongwith o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.