SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 130

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.
Hanuman - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. - Respondents
CWP-7778-2013
Decided On : 16-01-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. V.B. Aggarwal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the Respondent

The main legal point established in the judgment is that employees of the Panchayat Samiti are entitled to pension, gratuity, and leave encashment under the relevant provisions of the Punjab Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishads Act, 1961, and the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Services Rules, 1965.

Headnote:

Pension - Panchayat Samiti Employee - Punjab Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishads Act, 1961, Section 33(c); Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Services Rules, 1965, Section 15 - The court discussed the applicability of pension, gratuity, and leave encashment to employees of the Panchayat Samiti under the relevant sections of the 1961 Act and the 1965 Rules. It interpreted the provisions to establish that the Punjab Civil Service Rules are applicable to the petitioner, entitling them to pension, gratuity, and leave encashment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought retiral benefits and revision of pay scale from the respondents. The respondents argued that the petitioner had no right to demand pension, leave encashment, and gratuity as they were not admissible to Panchayat Samiti employees.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, as an employee of the Panchayat Samiti, was entitled to pension, gratuity, and leave encashment under the relevant provisions of the Punjab Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishads Act, 1961, and the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Services Rules, 1965.

Issues: The issues revolved around the entitlement of the petitioner to retiral benefits as an employee of the Panchayat Samiti and the applicability of relevant provisions to their case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Punjab Civil Service Rules, including provisions for pension, gratuity, and leave encashment, are applicable to the employees of the Panchayat Samiti, as per the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Services Rules, 1965.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the court directed the respondents to grant the petitioner's retiral benefits, with a refund of the received CPF amount and calculation of gratuity within a specified period.

JUDGMENT

Nirmaljit Kaur, J. - The present petition is filed for seeking a direction to the respondents to grant retiral benefits, i.e. pension, gratuity, leave encashment and also the benefit of revision of pay scale w.e.f. 01.01.2006 instead of 01.04.2010 in the pay band of Rs.4440-7440 plus Grade pay alongwith arrears of salary on that account.

2. The petitioner was initially appointed in Panchayat Samiti, Thanesar, as Mali on daily wages on D.C. rates in May 1983 and after that, his services were regularised in the Panchayat Samiti, Thanesar, vide order dated 22.11.1995 in pursuance to the order of the High Court dated 09.11.1992. He retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.11.2010.

3. As per reply, the petitioner has been given the benefit of CPF which was released to him and the petitioner already accepted the said sum of Rs.1,06,050/-. It is further stated that the Panchayat Samiti is dependent upon its own sources for its funds and as such, the petitioner has no right to file the present petition and demand the pension, leave encashment, gratuity, which are not admissible to the employees of the Panchayat Samiti.

4. Heard.

5. As per Section 33(c ) of the Punjab Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parsihads Act, 1961 (for short, the 1961 Act), the employees of the said Panchayat Samiti are entitled to the pension or subscribe on their behalf for pension or gratuity. The relevant part of Section 33 of the 1961 Act is reproduced below:-

'33. Employment of Servants.- (1) (a) to (b) XX XX XX

(c) grant them pension or subscribe on their behalf for pension or gratuity;

Provided that -

(i) the conditions of grant of leave allowance, Provident Fund, pension gratuity and annuity shall not be more favorable than those prescribed for persons in the service of the Government;

(ii) no leave allowance, Provident Fund, pension, gratuity or annuity granted to a servant shall exceed the sum which, under any general or special order for the time being in force, such servant would be entitled to if his service had been under the Government.'

6. Section 15 of the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Services Rules, 1965 (for short the 1965 Rules) provides for application of the provisions of the Punjab Civil Services Rules in case any matter is not expressly covered by the above mentioned Rules or any other Rule framed under the 1961 Act. Section 15 of the 1965 Rules reads thus:-

'15(1) In matters not expressly covered by these rules or any other rules framed under the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, 1961, the members of the service shall be governed by the provisions of the Punjab Civil Services Rules as amended from time to time in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the aforesaid Act, and the rules made thereunder:

Provided that for words 'Government Servants' wherever they occur in the Punjab Civil Services Rules the words 'Panchayat Samiti or Zila Parishad, as the case may be', and 'member of the Punjab Panchayat Smitis and Zila Parishads Service' shall be deemed to have been constituted respectively.

(2) The competent authority may construe the provisions of the rules referred to in sub-rule(1) above with such adaptations not affecting the substance thereof as may be necessary or proper in order to adapt them to the matter before such authority:

Provided that if any doubt arises regarding the adaptations with which the said rules should be construed, the matter shall be referred to the Government and the decision of the Government on such reference shall be final.'

7. Section 33 of the 1961 Act as reproduced above stood deleted by virtue of Section 13 of the Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1973, which was published in the Haryana Gazette (Extra) Legislative Supplement, Para I, dated June 13, 1973. Therefore, it is apparent that Rule 15(1) shall come into operation vide which members of the service are held to be governed by the Punjab Civil Service Ru

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top