SUVIR SEHGAL
Gurtej Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suvir Sehgal, J. (Oral) - Present petition is for quashing of FIR No.202 dated 28.09.2017, under Sections 324, 323, 34 IPC (Section 326 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Baghapurana, District Moga, on the basis of compromise dated 30.07.2019 (Annexure P2) alongwith all subsequent proceeding arising therefrom.
2. Vide order dated 21.08.2019, the trial Court was directed to record the statements of all the concerned parties, with regard to the genuineness and validity or otherwise of the compromise by this Court.
3. In compliance thereof, report dated 19.09.2019 from the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baghapurana, has been received through District and Sessions Judge, Moga, in which, it has been submitted that the compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side.
4. The Honble Full Bench of this Court in case Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Honble Division Bench of this Court in case Sube Singh and another v. State of Haryana and another, 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 102 observed that compounding of offence can be allowed even after conviction, during proceedings of the appeal again
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another 2012(4) RCR(Cri) 543
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.