SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sudhir Mittal, J.
Neetu Kukar - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
CWP Nos. 36086 and 32762 of 2019
Decided On : 28-02-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. D.S. Khurana, Advocate, for the Appellant in CWP No. 36086 of 2019 & for the Respondent No. 5 in CWP No. 32762 of 2019; Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate, for the Appellant in CWP No. 32762 of 2019 & for the Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 in CWP No. 36086 of 2019; Ms. Monica Chibber Sharma, Sr. DAG Punjab, for the Respondent; Mr. J.S. Ghuman, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 3; Mr. M.K. Garg, Advocate with Ms. Charu Sharma, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 10

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the practice of grouping students into sections based on their marks was found to be discriminatory and violative of child rights under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Headnote:

Discrimination - Education - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (2009 Act') - Section 16, Section 17, Section 31, Section 32 - The court found that the practice of grouping students into sections based on their marks was arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of child rights. The court also held that the Commission's order was within its jurisdiction, but it did not have the right to review or modify its order without notice or granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a dispute over the practice of grouping students into sections based on their marks at an elementary school, which was alleged to be discriminatory and violative of child rights. The Punjab State Commission for Protection of Child Rights had issued an order to discontinue this practice, which was later modified without notice to the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the practice of grouping students into sections based on their marks was discriminatory and violative of child rights. It also held that the Commission's order was within its jurisdiction, but it did not have the right to review or modify its order without notice or granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Issues: The issues considered by the court were: (a) Whether the action of the School of grouping students of Class VI onwards into Sections on the basis of marks is arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of child rights? (b) Whether order dated 7.8.2019 passed by the Commission was within its jurisdiction? (c) Whether the Commission has the right to review/modify its order?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the practice of grouping students into sections based on their marks was discriminatory and violative of child rights. It also determined that the Commission's order was within its jurisdiction, but it did not have the right to review or modify its order without notice or granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Final Decision: CWP No. 36086 of 2019 is allowed and CWP No. 32762 of 2019 is dismissed. However, respondents No. 8 and 9 are directed to implement the order of the Commission w.e.f. the next academic session.

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Mittal, J. - This judgment shall decide CWP Nos. 36086 and 32762 of 2019 as common questions of facts and law are involved.

2. CWP No. 36086 of 2019 has been filed by the parent of a child studying in Dashmesh Public School, Talwandi Road, Faridkot (hereinafter referred to as 'the School'), the Director and Principal of which have been impleaded as respondents No. 8 and 9, respectively. Her basic grievance is that from Class VI onwards, the children are being classified into sections on the basis of marks secured in the previous examination. Another parent had raised a similar grievance by sending a representation dated 20.05.2019 to respondent No. 9. The representation was necessitated because the child of the said parent had become extremely upset as she could not make it to the top section. She had even taken the extreme step of gulping liquid hand wash in an attempt to end her life. No action was taken upon the said representation and, therefore, the petitioner sent a representation dated 23.05.2019 to respondent No. 9 and to various officials of the Central Government, State Government, Central Board of Secondary Education and the National and State Commissions constituted for protection of child rights. The Punjab State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (respondent No. 12) took cognizance and issued notice to respondent No. 9. A reply dated 19.06.2009 was filed on behalf of the said respondent wherein grouping children into sections on the basis of their marks was not denied. Infact, the same was defended on the ground of being an age old norm for the purpose of bringing homogeneity in the class. The allegation that the top sections are being provided better teaching facilities was, however, denied. The complaint was labelled as 'motivated' as the child of the petitioner was not able to get the section of her choice. Respondent No. 12 - Punjab State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission') decided the issue vide order dated 07.08.2019 and directed respondents No. 8 and 9 to discontinue the practice of forming sections on the basis of merit forthwith. The directions were also issued to reshuffle the sections within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order. The parties were not given an opportunity to lead evidence as the allegations had been admitted by respondent No. 9 although the said respondent had tried to justify the same. The School failed to implement the directions of the Commission and, therefore, the petitioner got a legal notice dated 18.08.2019 sent through her lawyer. The Deputy Commissioner, Faridkot, also asked the School to implement the order to which the School responded vide communication dated 20.08.2019 that the order shall be implemented after conclusion of the half yearly session, the examination for which ended on 03.08.2019. Thereafter, the School and some parents of children of the top section approached the Commission for review/modification of its order dated 07.08.2019. The Commission modified its order on 09.09.2019 without issuing notice to the petitioner or granting her an opportunity of hearing. Modification was to the extent of permitting the School to continue with the existing sections till the end of the academic session. Consequently, the present writ petition has been filed with the prayer of quashing order dated 09.09.2019 passed by the Commission and for direction to respondents No. 1 to 6 to get the order dated 07.08.2019 implemented. Directions have also been sought to the said respondent to take appropriate action against respondents No. 8 and 9 for discrimination and causing mental trauma.

3. The School has filed CWP No. 32762 of 2019 for quashing the order dated 07.08.2019 and order dated 09.09.2019 passed by the Commission and for permitting the School to carry on with its practice of grouping children into sections on the basis of their marks.

4. On behalf of the State of Punjab and its officials a d

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top