SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 299

HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Pal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Amarjit Kaur Khurana, DAG, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harminder Singh Madaan, J. - Accused Surinder Singh faced trial by learned Sessions Judge, Bathinda, who vide judgment dated 2.3.2006 convicted him for the offences under Sections 304-A and 279 IPC and vide order of the even date he was sentenced as under:

Under Section

Sentence Awarded

Under Section

304-A IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of making payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

304-A IPC

279 IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for six months.

279 IPC

2. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

3. The accused-convict-Surinder Singh, who is appellant before this Court, prays that the appeal be accepted, the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed against him be set aside and he be acquitted of the charge framed against him.

4. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 6.12.2004, Sub-Inspector Roop Singh, Incharge Police Post, Bulluana (hereinafter referred to as the Investigating Officer/I.O.) had rece

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top