Surinder Singh @ Shinda vs Union Territory, Chandigarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(P&H) 492

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Surinder Singh @ Shinda – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J.S.Bedi, Mr. Sonpreet Singh Brar, Mr. G.NMalik, Ms. G.K.Mann, Advocate,
For the Respondent: Mr. Y.S.Rathore, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. By this judgment, CRA-S-644-SB-2017 and CRA-S-730-SB-2017 as well as CRR No.1087 of 2017 arising from a common judgment passed by the learned trial court shall stand disposed of. Learned counsels representing the parties are ad-idem that these two appeals and a revision petition can conveniently be disposed of by a common order.

2. Two appeals have been filed by the convicts, whereas the revision petition has been preferred by the prosecutrix. Relevant part of the order of sentence reads as under:-

3. The convict Surinder Singh @ Shinda is sentenced as under:-

U/S 120 r/w Section 120-B IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.500/- (Rs. Five Hundred only). In default of payment of fine, to further under imprisonment of same kind for 10 days.
U/S 354-A r/w Section 120-B IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for three year and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- (Rs. One Thousand only). In default of payment of fine, to further under imprisonment of same kind for 20 days
U/S: 292 r/w Section 120-B IPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(P&H) 492

ANIL KSHETARPALSurinder Singh @ Shinda – AppellantVersusUnion Territory, Chandigarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Surinder Singh @ Shinda – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh – Respondent