SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
Bhanu Prashar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana and Others – Respondents
C.W.P. No. 6423 of 2020
Decided On : 06-03-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jagbir Malik.

Appointment based on fake certificates is a nullity in law, and the delinquent is not entitled to protection under Article 311 or the Punishment and Appeals Rules. The seriousness of using a fake degree for securing employment warrants no scope for leniency.

Headnote:

Fake B.Ed. Certificate - Termination of Service - Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 2016 - Article 311 of the Constitution of India - Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad and Others vs. B. Karunakar and Others, 1994 (1) SCT 319

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Sanskrit Teacher, challenged the termination of his services based on the allegation that his B.Ed. certificate was fake. He argued violation of Article 311 of the Constitution of India and the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 2016.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's appointment based on a fake certificate was a nullity in law, and therefore, he was not entitled to protection under Article 311 or the Punishment and Appeals Rules. The court also rejected the petitioner's plea for a lesser penalty, emphasizing the seriousness of using a fake degree for securing employment.

Issues: Violation of Article 311 and Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 2016, entitlement to protection under the mentioned provisions, and the possibility of imposing a lesser penalty.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that appointment based on fake certificates is a nullity in law, and the delinquent is not entitled to protection under Article 311 or the Punishment and Appeals Rules. The court also emphasized the seriousness of using a fake degree for securing employment, warranting no scope for leniency.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the termination of the petitioner's services was upheld.

JUDGMENT :

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.

1. Petitioner, who was serving as Sanskrit Teacher under the Haryana State Education Department, has filed the instant writ petition assailing the order dated 28.02.2020 (Annexure P-7) passed by the District Elementary Education Officer, Gurugram and whereby his services have been terminated on the ground that his B.Ed. certificate from Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, has been found to be fake.

2. Facts in brief may be noticed.

3. Pursuant to an advertisement No. 2/2006 issued by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission, petitioner applied for the post of Sanskrit Teacher. He was duly selected for the post in question and joined on 18.08.2009. Petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated 04.02.2020 alleging that the B.Ed. Certificate dated 28.08.2004 on the basis of which he had been appointed as Sanskrit Teacher is fake. Petitioner was afforded 15 days time to explain his position as regards the B.Ed. Certificate and was also directed to produce the original B.Ed. certificate. Petitioner submitted a reply dated 18.02.2020 (Annexure P-4). It is upon consideration of the reply furnished by the petitioner that the impugned order of termination dated 28.02.2020 has been passed.

4. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the action of termination is in violation of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. It is contended that a member of any civil service under the State can be dismissed, removed or reduced in rank only after conducting an enquiry. Counsel urges that in the present case no formal enquiry was conducted and as such the impugned order cannot sustain. It has further been asserted that even under the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 2016 a regular enquiry is contemplated prior to imposition of a major penalty and whereas no such procedure has been followed. In a nutshell violation of the principles of natural justice has been alleged. Yet another argument raised by counsel is that apart from the B.Ed. qualification obtained from Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, the petitioner possesses another B.Ed. Degree from Jiwaji University, Gwalior and if the B.Ed. Degree from Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut is to be considered as fake the second B.Ed. Degree from Jiwaji University, Gwalior can enure to the benefit of the petitioner. It is further argued that the petitioner had already put in more than 10 years of regular service and as such the extreme penalty of termination from service is harsh and the same could be substituted by imposition of a lesser penalty.

5. Counsel for the petitioner has been heard at length and pleadings on record have been perused.

6. At the very outset, it may be taken note that Mr. Jagbir Malik, learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly conceded during the course of arguments that B.Ed. was an essential qualification as per advertisement No. 2/2006 for the post of Sanskrit Teacher and for which the petitioner had applied. It has also been conceded that at the stage of applying for the post and having been selected, petitioner had gained entry in service on the post of Sanskrit Teacher on the strength of the B.Ed. Degree allegedly issued by the Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut. In the present case petitioner was issued a show cause notice by the respondent-department alleging that in a verification process the B.Ed. Degree has been found to be fake. Apart from calling for an explanation from the petitioner he was directed to produce the original B.Ed. Certificate. The reply dated 18.02.2020 furnished by the petitioner is placed on record and appended as Annexure P-5 alongwith the writ petition. No where in the reply to the show cause notice petitioner has asserted that his B.Ed. Degree from Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut is genuine. No document in support of the qualification and certificate issued by Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut was appended alongwith the reply to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top