HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Kusamjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.
1. In the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner retired from service on 31.03.2017 after availing extension for a period of two years after attaining the age of superannuation, but all the pensionary benefits for which the petitioner is entitled, have not been released to her. The prayer of the petitioner is for directing the respondents to release all the pensionary benefits of the petitioner to her forthwith alongwith arrears and interest.
2. As per the facts mentioned in the present writ petition, the petitioner was initially appointed as a Steno-Typist with the respondent-Department of Cultural Affairs Archeology and Museums, Government of Punjab, on 16.06.1976. Thereafter, she was promoted as a Senior Assistant on 16.10.1996 and continued working as such till 17.11.2008 when she was promoted to the post of Superintendent Grade-II. Thereafter, the petitioner was promoted as Superintendent Grade-I and she attained the age of superannuation on 31.03.2015. Thereafter petitioner was granted extension for a period of two years and ultimately she retired from service on 31.03.2017.
3. The grievance of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.