JUDGMENT :

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J.

1. Present regular second appeal has been filed by the appellants/plaintiffs against the impugned judgment & decree dated 17.01.1997 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ambala whereby an appeal of the defendants-respondents (cross-objectors) was partly allowed and the judgment & decree dated 28.10.1993 of learned Additional Senior Sub Judge Ambala, decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs appellants for redemption of land pertaining to mutation Nos.333, 334, 447 and 790 was set aside.

2. Respondents/defendants are in cross-objections against the same very impugned judgment & decree dated 17.01.1997, whereby their claim regarding mutation No.879 was declined and decree of learned trial Court to that extent was maintained.

3. It is noteworthy that Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2019) 7 SCC 219 titled as “Kirori (since deceased) through his LRs. Vs. Ram Parkash and others” has held that framing of substantial question of law by this Court while deciding the regular second appeal by this Court is not required.

4. At the outset, it has been pointed out by learned counsel for the appellants that controversy in the present case is squarely covered by the jud