AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Arrive Safe Society Of Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Uoi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia referred to the judgment of the Apex Court in Destruction of Public and Private Properties, in Re v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others (2009) 5 SCC 212 , and relied upon para 12 thereof, wherein certain guidelines hve been laid down by the Apex Court relating to holding of demonstration, which are in the following terms:-
"(I) The organizer shall meet the police to review and revise the route to be taken and to lay down conditions for a peaceful march or protest;
(II) All weapons, including knives, lathis and the like shall be prohibited;
(III) An undertaking is to be provided by the organizers to ensure a peaceful march with marshals at each relevant junction;
(IV) The police and State Government shall ensure videography of such protests to the maximum extent possible;
(V) The person in charge to supervise the demonstration shall be the SP (if the situation is confined to the district) and the highest police officer in the State, where the situation stretches beyond one district;
(VI) In the event that demonstrations turn violent, the officer-in-charge shall ensure that the events are videographed through private operators
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.