JUDGMENT

Daya Chaudhary, J. - The present petition has been filed under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiating the contempt proceedings for not complying with the directions issued by this Court in CWP No.3329- CAT of 2004, whereby, the petitioner was held entitled to the benefits.

2. Petitioner filed CWP No.3329-CAT of 2004, which was disposed of with a direction to the respondent, on the basis of statement made by counsel for Union of India, to release the necessary consequential benefits, if any, as a consequence of voluntary retirement of the petitioner vide order dated 21.03.2014, within a period of three months. It was a case where the petitioner was compulsorily retired and the said order was challenged by him. Subsequently, during pendency of the petition, the request of the petitioner for voluntary retirement was accepted but some of the consequential benefits were not released to him. Thereafter, the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing the present contempt petition.

3. In response to notice of motion, the reply was filed, wherein, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has been released the benefits of revised leave encashment, revis