Back
H.S.MADAAN
Anik Bansal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.S. Madaan, J —Vide this judgment, I propose to dispose of three criminal revisions i.e. CRR-3335-2017 filed by petitioner Anik Bansal, CRR3556-2017 filed by petitioner Vinkal Arora and CRR-3597-2017 filed by petitioner Anurag Chadda.
2. These revision petitions are directed against the judgment dated 5.9.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri vide which the judgment dated 21.2.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri convicting accused for offences under Sections 468, 471, 506 read with Section 120-B IPC and order dated 23.2.2015 sentencing them for those offence were upheld, whereas the appeals filed by accused-convicts were dismissed.
3. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri had sentenced the accused as under:
| Offence under Section | Sentence Awarded |
| Section 468 IPC. | Simple imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each. |
| Section 471 IPC. | Simple imprisonment for a period of six months each. |
| Section 120-B IPC |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
