SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3175

T.P.S.MANN, DEEPAK SIBAL
Karamjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash Rawat And Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P.S. Ghuman, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Sibal, J —Through the instant application filed under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), the applicant seeks grant of special leave to appeal against the judgment dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala (for short the trial court), through which the respondents have been acquitted of the charges framed against them under Sections 452, 382, 379, 323, 506, 342, 382, 392, 364, 149, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC).

2. Briefly stated, the case of the applicant-complainant, as per the complaint filed before the Court of Illaqa Magistrate, is that the complainant is in the business of grinding of mustard oil, grains and spices as well as rice shelling. On 04.08.2006 at 07:00 PM, respondents Dhanna Singh, Kuldeep Singh and Sarabjit Singh, after coming to the applicant's residence, abused and threatened to kill him and his family members if he did not withdraw the case filed by him which was pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patiala. As per the allegations, the aforesaid respondents were armed and respondents Nirmal Dass and Kuldeep Singh caught hold of the applicant whe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top