SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3178

H.S.MADAAN
Rajan @ Dabbu And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of U T , Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sudesh Kumar, Adv., Meenakshi Lohia, Adv., Ashima Mor, Adv., R.S. Saini, Adv.

JUDGMENT

H. S. Madaan, J —Vide this judgment, I propose to dispose of three appeals i.e. CRA-S-344-SB-2015 filed by appellants Rajan @ Dabbu and Arjun @ Mulia, CRA-S-366-SB-2015 filed by appellant Dharampal @ Gail and CRA-S-2318-SB of 2015 filed by appellant Sonu @ Bakriwala, all of them being accused in FIR No.642 dated 25.11.2013, under Section 395 IPC, registered with Police Station Manimajra, Chandigarh, who were tried by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh and vide order dated 9.10.2014, they were convicted for the offence under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC and vide order dated 10.10.2014 sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months each.

2. The accused-convicts, who are appellants before this Court prayed that the appeals be accepted, the impugned judgment of their conviction and order of sentence be set aside and they be acquitted of the charge framed against them.

3. Briefly stated, facts of the case as per prosecution story are that on 25.11.2013, a police party headed by SI Dharampal from Police Station M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top