SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3195

JAISHREE THAKUR
Vikash – Appellant
Versus
Sangeeta And Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S. Rana, Adv., Rajinder Paul, Adv., Sunil Chadha, Adv., M.S. Atwal, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Jaishree Thakur, J —The petitioner herein seeks to challenge order dated 02.05.2014 passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Sonepat wherein interim maintenance, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., has been allowed to the respondents at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per month from the date of application.

2. In brief, the facts are that respondents-complainants filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance from the petitioner. It was alleged that a marriage was solemnized between Vikash and Sangeeta as per Hindu rites and rituals on 24.04.2012, out of which wedlock, one female child namely Vernika was born. At the time of marriage, a sufficient amount was spent by the parents of Sangeeta, however, on amount of demand for a bigger car and harassment on account of inadequate dowry, she was turned out of her matrimonial home on 23.09.2013 along with the minor child. On account of beatings, harassment and cruelty meted out to her, FIR No. 477 dated 26.09.2013, under Sections 147, 149, 452, 323, 427 and 506 of the IPC was registered at Police Station Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. Having no source of income or means to support herself and the minor daughter, the respondent-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top