SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3326

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Lisa Gill, J.
Prince Kalra - Appellant
Versus
Heena Kalra And Others - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 7912 of 2017
Decided On : 02-08-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Gautam Dutt, Adv., M.K. Sood, Adv., Lovekirat Singh Chahal, Adv.

The welfare of the minor children is the paramount consideration in custody disputes.

Headnote:

Domestic Violence Act - Custody of Children - Sections 12, 17 to 20, 22 and 23 of the Domestic Violence Act - Summary: The court discussed the custody of children, right of residence, and interim maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act. It upheld the direction for restoration of possession of the shared household, granted visitation rights to the petitioner, and modified the interim maintenance amount. The court emphasized the welfare of the minor children and the right of residence for the respondent wife.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, regarding the custody of the minor children, right of residence, and interim maintenance.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the direction for restoration of possession of the shared household, granted visitation rights to the petitioner, and modified the interim maintenance amount. It emphasized the welfare of the minor children and the right of residence for the respondent wife.

Issues: Custody of children, right of residence, and interim maintenance.

Ratio Decidendi: The welfare of the minor children is the paramount consideration. The respondent wife is entitled to the right of residence at the rented premises. The court has an onerous duty to ensure the welfare, well-being, and interest of the minor children.

Final Decision: The court modified the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, and directed the petitioner to hand over the custody of the minor children to the respondent wife, granted visitation rights to the petitioner, and provided for the right of residence for the respondent wife at the rented premises. The court also directed the trial court to conclude the proceedings within three months.

JUDGMENT

Lisa Gill, J. - The petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 23.02.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad whereby appeal preferred by respondent No. 1 (petitioner's wife) has been disposed of while upsetting the directions given by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad vide order dated 06.01.2017 on an application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ('the Domestic Violence Act' for short).

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the case are that respondent No. 1 wife of the petitioner, filed a petition under Sections 12, 17 to 20, 22 and 23 of the Domestic Violence Act with the averments that her marriage was solemnised with the petitioner on 15.08.2014 at Faridabad. It was their second marriage, both of them being divorced prior to their marriage. Applicant-respondent No. 1 had a son from the first marriage and she had custody of the said child. The petitioner, it was stated, expressed eagerness to adopt the child of respondent No. 1 from the first marriage. Accordingly, the child was adopted by the petitioner on 16.08.2014. Adoption deed No. 1089 was registered on 16.01.2015. However, after marriage, behaviour of the petitioner and his parents i.e. respondents No. 2 and 3 was rude towards the son of respondent No. 1. The couple was blessed with twins (both sons on 21.06.2015).

3. It is pleaded that the behaviour of the petitioner and his parents became worse after the birth of twins. Respondent No. 1 was pressurised for cancellation of adoption deed and in order to save her matrimony she was compelled to give her consent for cancellation of the adoption deed. Civil suit was filed on 17.09.2015 wherein respondent No. 1 and her father admitted the claim set forth by the petitioner. Adoption deed was, accordingly, declared null and void. Respondent wife, it is stated, was compelled to hand over the custody of her child from first marriage to her parents. CCTV cameras were installed in the matrimonial house. Respondent wife was allegedly restrained from meeting her eldest son. Allegations regarding demand of dowry as well as unnatural sexual intercourse, sodomy etc. were raised against the petitioner. Immoral and illicit relations with other woman by the petitioner were also alleged. It was pleaded that on 17.12.2016 respondent wife had gone to parental home to see her eldest son (from first marriage), however, when she returned to her matrimonial home the house was found locked. The petitioner, his parents alongwith twin children had fled from the house. Lock of the house was not opened despite information to the police. The respondent - wife, it is stated was compelled to live in veranda of the house. Thus aggrieved, above said

    (i)grant the residence order of three bedroom on the ground floor at shared house No. 5M/123 & 5M/55 NIT Faridabad;

      (ii)restraining the respondents not to interfere in the life of appellant/applicant and children;

        (iii)restraining the respondents from alienating or creating any third party interest on the shared house;

          (iv)compensation under Sections 20 & 22 of the Domestic Violence Act for treatment, mental pressure, emotional stress, mental and physical violence upon the appellant/applicant, and to grant protection order under Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act;

            (v)to give the possession of all her Istridhan, and valuable clothes, jewelery etc;

              (vi)relief of Rs. 20 lakhs alongwith monthly maintenance of Rs. 10 lakhs;

                (vii)claimed immediate custody of both the minor children; and

                  (viii)for unlocking the premises etc.

                  4. It was averred that the petitioner was a businessman in his own right having an income of more than Rs. 40 lakhs per month as well as rental income. The petitioner was stated to be the owner of various residential properties in Faridabad and Gurgaon as well agricultural land. Application under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act for interim relief was also moved by respondent No. 1.

                  5. The p

                                                                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                          1
                                                                          2
                                                                          3
                                                                          4
                                                                          5
                                                                          6
                                                                          7
                                                                          8
                                                                          9
                                                                          10
                                                                          11
                                                                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                          supreme today icon
                                                                          logo-black

                                                                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                          Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                          qr

                                                                          Scan Me!

                                                                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                                                          whatsapp-icon Back to top