SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3330

H.S.MADAAN
Ranjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab And Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sushma Chopra, Adv., Dhruv Dayal, Adv., Mohinder Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

H.S. Madaan, J. - This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for pre-arrest bail has been filed by the petitioner Ranjit Kaur, an accused in FIR No.94 dated 10.9.2016, under Sections 498-A/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Majitha, District Amritsar.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as per prosecution version are that complainant Sandeep Kaur was married with Amandeep Singh son of late Darshan Singh and Ranjit Kaur (present petitioner) on 7.1.2015 and at the time of the marriage, parents of the complainant had given considerable dowry articles, which had been handed over to the petitioner and other members of the family and they have committed criminal breach of trust with regard to those dowry articles. After the marriage, the complainant was harassed and maltreated by her husband Amandeep Singh, mother-in-law Ranjit Kaur, husband's younger brother Pradeep Singh, sister-in-law Amanpreet Kaur for the reason that she had brought less dowry. On 26.1.2015 her husband had gone to Dubai. Demands of more dowry were raised and when the complainant could not fulfil those demands, she was given beatings and turned out of the matrimonial home.

3. On complaint having been subm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top