SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3526

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Bindo @ Bimla – Appellant
Versus
Bachan Gir And Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Lath, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - Plaintiff-Appellant is in the regular second appeal against the judgment passed by the learned First Appellate Court.

2. Dispute in the present case is with respect to the estate of Maya Devi. Plaintiff claims that she is owner of 22 bighas and 2 biswas of land and sale deeds executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendants No.4 to 8 with respect to land measuring 11 bighas as also dated 10.01.2007 in favour of defendant No.2 with regard to land measuring 11 bighas and 12 biswas are null and void and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff.

3. Plaintiff-Bindo @ Bimla has pleaded that on the death of Sh. Devi Gir, property was inherited by Kishan Gir, who was married to Maya Devi and the plaintiff is their only daughter. Plaintiff claims that defendant No.1 has forged a registered Will dated 19.08.1980 of Kishan Gir, which is result of fraud. She further claims that the mutation of land on the basis of alleged registered Will dated 19.08.1980 is also wrong. She further claims that it was a plaintiff, who used to serve late Sh. Kishan Gir and last rites were performed by the plaintiff.

4. Plaintiff has further pleaded that defendant No.3 namely Rosh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top