Naveen vs State Of Haryana - 2018 Supreme(P&H) 3536

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3536

H.S.MADAAN
Naveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Shashikant Gupta, Adv., Kanhiya Soni, Adv., Gaurav Bansal, Adv.

JUDGMENT

H.S. Madaan, J. - Accused Naveen faced trial by learned Additional Sessions Judge(Exclusive Court), Bhiwani, who vide judgment dated 10.1.2018 convicted him for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n)/450 IPC and vide order 11.1.2018, he was sentenced as under:

Under Section	Sentence Awarded
376(2)(n) IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.
450 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months

Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The accused-convict Naveen, who is appellant before this Court prays that the appeal be accepted, the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed against him be set aside and he be acquitted of the charge framed against him.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, as per the prosecution story, are that on 8.8.2017, the prosecutrix (name withhel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3536

H.S.MADAANNaveen – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

H.S.MADAAN
Naveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent