IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Jaswant Singh @ Ladi - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
CRM No. 673 of 2018 IN CRA-S No. 281-SB of 2016
Decided On : 19-01-2018
Extension of Time - Travel Abroad - The court granted an extension of time for the applicant to travel abroad, subject to specific conditions and undertakings, including the requirement to obtain written permission from the Court to apply for a passport if a criminal case is pending.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought an extension of time to travel to the USA, as the previously granted time had lapsed while waiting for a passport application.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the application, extending the time for the applicant to travel to the USA, subject to the same terms and conditions as the previous order.
Issues: Extension of time for travel abroad, requirement for written permission to apply for a passport with a pending criminal case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the applicant's request for an extension of time and the requirement for written permission to apply for a passport with a pending criminal case, ultimately granting the extension based on the specific conditions and undertakings.
Final Decision: The court granted the extension of time for the applicant to travel to the USA, with specific conditions and undertakings, including the requirement to obtain written permission from the Court to apply for a passport if a criminal case is pending.
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. —Prayer in this application is for extension of time granting to the applicant-appellant, vide order dated 29.09.2017, for travelling abroad i.e. USA.
2. Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the applicant/appellant was granted permission w.e.f. 01.11.2017 till 01.01.2018, subject to furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 50 lacs with one surety in the like amount besides bank guarantee in the sum of Rs. 10 lacs of nationalized bank to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and with further undertaking that the applicant-appellant will return in India within a period granted by this Court.
3. Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the appellant has already applied for obtaining a passport and as per one of the condition in the application for applying for passport, as per the Government notification dated 25.08.1993, it is provided that if a criminal case is pending against an applicant in any Court, the applicant can apply for a passport subject to the conditions that he has enclosed a valid written permission granted by the Court allowing the applicant to travel abroad. Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that he has already applied for the passport and in the intervening period the time prescribed by this Court has lapsed.
4. Notice of the application to Advocate General, Haryana.
5. Mr. Kanisth Ganeriwala, AAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, and has no serious objection to the prayer of the applicant/appellant.
6. In view of the same, this application is allowed. The time granted by this Court vide order dated 29.09.2017 is extended on the same terms and conditions and the applicant/appellant-Punjab Singh is allowed to visit USA. Since the process for obtaining the passport as well as visa may take some time, the permission is granted to the applicant-appellant for a period of two months' from the date of departure from India. However, it is clarified that after the petitioner has obtained passport/visa, he will again submit an undertaking before the Chief Judicial Magistrate by giving intimation of his date of departure and arrival in India in terms of this order as well earlier order dated 29.09.2017.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.