JUDGMENT

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. - This judgment shall dispose of above mentioned three revision petitions filed on behalf of Vimmy @ Anju Aggarwal, Vinay Kumar and Paramjit Singh challenging judgment dated 10.7.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby appeals filed by them against judgment dated 6.11.2013 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana convicting them for offences punishable under Sections 419 and 420 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860, have been dismissed.

2. The FIR, in the present case, was lodged at the instance of Pavitpal Singh, who alleged that he had met one property dealer namely Pardip Kumar who told him that one plot measuring 1766 square yards situated at Barewal Awana, District Ludhiana had been shown to him by one seller. It is alleged that Pardip Kumar called the said seller Vinay Kumar Dhir on telephone, who turned up along with Paramjit Singh and his wife Vimmy and who showed the plot in question to complainant. The complainant became interested in the said plot. The aforesaid persons were asked to bring the documents in respect of the property in question. On 9.5.2002, the aforesaid Vinay Kumar