JUDGMENT

ORDER

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - The tenant petitioner is in the revision petition against the order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controlloer, affirmed in the appeal by the appellate authority.

2. The point for determination is whether landlords bonafidely require the premises for their son or not"?

3. The landlords are husband and wife, who have sought eviction of the tenant from the premises in dispute in order to settle their son Hargun, who has done his Graduation in Business Administration and was previously working when his father was into a joint family business but now has started his own independent work under the name of Hargun Tea Company and he requires the premises for godown to run Tea business.

4. The tenant contested the petition by pleading that the landlords have other godown in their possession and they are more than 25 rooms on the first floor of the tenanted premises out of which many rooms are vacant.

5. In the rejoinder, it was pleaded by the landlords that they have no other suitable building and have not vacated any other building without sufficient cause within the urban area of Amritsar. It was further asserted that other godowns as referred