SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 4228

DEEPAK SIBAL
Anilesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Swati Yadav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the Parties

JUDGMENT

Deepak Sibal, J. (Oral) - The present petition has been jointly filed by the husband and wife and is directed against the order dated 29.08.2018, passed by the Additional District Judge, Rewari (for short, the Trial Court), through which an application jointly filed by both the parties to waive off the statutory period of six months as envisaged under Section 13-B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, the Act), has been dismissed.

2. The facts, in brief, which are required to be noticed for adjudicating upon the present petition are that the parties to the present litigation were married on 28.02.2017. However, in just about a month, due to temperamental differences, they separated on 31.03.2017. Thereafter, efforts were made for them to reconciliate but when such efforts bore no fruit, through a written compromise dated 22.08.2018 they decided to finally part ways. On the very next day of the compromise i.e. 23.08.2018 a petition under Section 13-B of the Act was filed by them seeking therein divorce by way of mutual consent. In such petition, the parties also filed an application seeking to waive off the statutory period of six months as envisaged under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top