RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Harpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sawinder Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Petitioners have assailed the order dated 25.05.2017 passed by Additional District Judge, Amritsar whereby application under Order 41, Rule 27 CPC filed by the plaintiffs/appellants therein for permission to lead additional evidence was allowed.
2. Perusal of the impugned order would show that the plaintiffs by way of additional evidence sought to produce jamabandi for the year 1887-88, jamabandi for the year 1890-91, jamabandi for the year 1921-22, Chhajra Nisab V 1936-37, jamabandi for the year 1936-37, khatauni istemal, naksha haqdarwar, certified copy of mutation No.1575 in respect of inheritance of Gurbax Singh son of Deva Singh son of jawahar Singh, copy of jamabandi for the year 1960-61 along with translations of above mentioned documents, jamabandi for the year 2000-01, jamabandi for the year 2005-06 and jamabandi for the year 2010-11. The aforesaid documents were claimed to be necessary documents for just decision of the appeal.
3. In view of Order 41, Rule 28 CPC, wherever additional evidence is allowed to be produced, the Appellate Court may either take such evidence, or direct the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred, or any othe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.