JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - Arguments were heard. Judgment was reserved. The judgment is being released.

2. Plaintiffs-appellants are in the Regular Second Appeal against the judgments passed by the Courts below.

3. In the considered opinion of this Court, following substantial questions of law arise for determination:-

1) Whether the testament scribed in the Tehsil Compound in which Sub-Registrar also has an office, non-registration of the testament becomes a suspicious circumstance?

2) Whether merely because both the attesting witnesses of the testament belongs to the Village where property is located and the testator used to reside before her marriage, particularly when the testament is with respect to the property received from her father, is a suspicious circumstance?

4. Dispute in the present case is with respect to estate of Krishni daughter of Hari Ram. Krishni received the property measuring 21 bighas and 1 biswas from her father-Hari Ram who died in the year 1960-61. Plaintiffs are her brothers and children of her predeceased brother. She was having four brothers, out of which, Sh. Anant Ram had died. Smt. Krishni was married and residing at Village Nangal whereas her b