SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1873

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rajbir Sehrawat, J.
Jainam Rathod - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana And Others - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 36693 of 2019
Decided On : 13-11-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Vikram Chaudhri, Adv., Sangram Saron, Adv., Sartaj Singh Gill, Adv., Rahil Mahajan, Adv., Chetan Mittal, Adv., Alok Kumar Jain, Adv., Himanshu Gupta, Adv., Deepak Sabharewal, Adv., Parshant Baliyan, Adv.

The legal framework outlines that bail in serious economic offences hinges on the severity of the allegations, the potential for witness tampering, and the likelihood of flight, with established criteria specific to economic crimes.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 447 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application for economic offences - The petitioner is accused of conspiring and committing fraud involving approximately Rs.90 Crores, reported lacking substantial documentation regarding transactions, and posing a risk of collusion with co-accused to influence witnesses - Petitioner seeking bail on the grounds of having cooperated during investigation; however, the court found considerable evidence of manipulative behavior and likelihood of interfering with judicial processes. (Paras 1-40)

(B) Serious Fraud Investigation - Powers of Investigation officer - The discretion to arrest is vested with the Investigating Officer and must be governed by statutory conditions which were not met in this case - Nevertheless, the presence of serious charges upheld the denial of bail based on the nature and severity of accusations. (Paras 11-26)

(C) Economic Offences - Bail considerations must reflect the gravity of economic crimes and the resultant threat to public funds, necessitating a cautious approach when assessing bail applications despite the presumption of innocence. (Paras 30-34)

Table of Content
1. background context of the appellant's bail application and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel emphasizing lack of evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. discussion on the investigatory powers and roles under the companies act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. analysis of the applicability of legal standards in economic offences. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court's final determination on bail, affirming the seriousness of charges. (Para 34 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Rajbir Sehrawat, J. - This petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for grant of regular bail pending trial in Criminal Complaint No.3 of 18.05.2019 CIS No. COMA/05/2019 CNR NO. HRGR01-007022-2019 titled as SFIO VS. ADARSH BUILD ESTATE ETC. under Sections 120 -B, 417, 418, 420, 467,468, 471, 474 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC '), and Section 447 of Companies Act, 2013 pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Gurugram.

2. It deserves to be pointed out at the outset that this case is one of the cases in a bunch; which were heard together. However, for making the things more distinct these cases are being decided vide separate judgments. However, since several aspects of the matter are common to all the cases and have even been argued on similar lines and even jointly, therefore, some aspects of the matter would form part of all the judgments.

3. The brief facts constituting allegations in this case are that one Multilevel Co-operative Society was got registered by one Mukesh Modi and family in the name of Adarsh Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Co-operative Society or (ACCSL). That Cooperative Society collected deposits from about 22 lakh investors. In the process about Rs.5000Crores were collected from investors from general public; which remained unreturned to the investors and, accordingly an amount of approximately Rs.9253Crores, including interest, is reflected in the accounts of the Society ACCSL, as payable to the investors. After collecting this money from the public, Mukesh Modi and family created a large number of Companies under the aegis of Adarsh Group of Companies Ltd. (AGCL), with their associates and relatives as the Directors. Subsequently these companies were shown having been advanced the loans of about Rs.1700Crores by the Co-operative Society ACCSL. Loans were required to be returned to the Co-operative Society by these Companies with interest, as per the alleged agreements of advancement of money. However, the same were not returned by the Companies. Therefore the money of the Co-operative Society was allegedly, being siphoned off through the Companies created by Adarsh Group of Companies Limited. When the matter came to knowledge of the Central Government, the Central Government, through Ministry of Corporate Affairs, vide the order dated 28/06/2018, passed in exercise of powers conferred under section 212 (1) (c) of Companies Act 2013 and section 43(2) & (3)(c)(i) of LLP ACT 2008, ordered an investigation into the affairs of the said companies, through the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (hereinafter referred to as SFIO), which is an instrumentality created under the new Companies Act for investigation into the affairs of the companies. During investigation it came out that 70 Companies of the Adarsh Group of Companies Ltd. had shown Rs.4140Crores approximately as payable to the said Co-operative Society; as the loan yet to be repaid. Still further, during investigation some companies out-side the Adarsh Group of Companies were also found to be the alleged collaborators of the Adarsh Group and those companies were also taken under investigation. Accordingly, a total of about 125 Companies (hereinafter referred to as CUIs), and some individuals, including the petitioner and his Companies as conspirators; were taken under investigation. After completion of the investigation and taking necessary permissions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top