Jainam Rathod vs State Of Haryana And Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1873

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Jainam Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana And Others – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Vikram Chaudhri, Adv., Sangram Saron, Adv., Sartaj Singh Gill, Adv., Rahil Mahajan, Adv., Chetan Mittal, Adv., Alok Kumar Jain, Adv., Himanshu Gupta, Adv., Deepak Sabharewal, Adv., Parshant Baliyan, Adv.

Table of Content
1. background context of the appellant's bail application and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel emphasizing lack of evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. discussion on the investigatory powers and roles under the companies act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. analysis of the applicability of legal standards in economic offences. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court's final determination on bail, affirming the seriousness of charges. (Para 34 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Rajbir Sehrawat, J. - This petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for grant of regular bail pending trial in Criminal Complaint No.3 of 18.05.2019 CIS No. COMA/05/2019 CNR NO. HRGR01-007022-2019 titled as SFIO VS. ADARSH BUILD ESTATE ETC. under Sections 120 -B, 417, 418, 420, 467,468, 471, 474 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC '), and Section 447 of Companies Act, 2013 pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Gurugram.

2. It deserves to be pointed out at the outset that this case is one of the cases in a bunch; which were heard together. However, for making the things more distinct these cases are being decided vide s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1873

RAJBIR SEHRAWATJainam Rathod – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana And Others – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Jainam Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana And Others – Respondent