Surender Singh Alias Tinku And Others vs State Of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1939

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Surender Singh Alias Tinku And Others – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Ghai, Advocate, Kanika Ahuja, Advocate, Shubra Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sharma, J. - This appeal is instituted against the judgment dated 22.12.2016 and order dated 11.1.2017, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, in Session Case No. 255 of 2013. Appellants Surender Singh alias Tinku, Anil, Amit alias Sunda and Vikas alias Chotiya were charged with and tried for the offence punishable under Sections 364, 302, 201, 120-B, 34 IPC and Section 27/54/59 of the Arms Act. They were convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment as under:-

S. No.	Name of convict	Under Sections	Imprisonment	Fine in (Rs.)	In default of payment of fine
1.	Surender @ Tinku	(1) 120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860	(1) Life Imprisonment	10,000/-	2 months
		(2) 364 read with 120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860	(2) 8 years	5,000/-	1 month
		(3) 302 read with 120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860	(3) Life Imprisonment till death in natural course	25,000/-	1 year
		(4) 201 read with 120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860	(4) 3 years	2,000/-	1 month
2.	Anil	(1) 120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860	(1) Life Imp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1939

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHUSurender Singh Alias Tinku And Others – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana – Respondent

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Surender Singh Alias Tinku And Others – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent