SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2039

H.S.GILL
Pargat Masih – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vivek Singla, Advocate, Sarbjit Singh Cheema, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. - Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 134 dated 21.8.2018, registered under Sections 408 IPC, Police Station Sultanwind, District Amritsar.

2. Prosecution story, in brief, is that Bikram Singh, Senior Officer (Operations) Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd. made a complaint to Commissioner of Police alleging that Pargat Masih, Lovejeet Singh (petitioners) and Daljit Singh were working on the post of Teller Machine Operator and their duty was to get the money from the bank and put the same in ATM machines and they had the password for opening and closing the ATM. It has been alleged that on 27.2.2018, Rs. 15,35,000/- was found to be less in ATM ID NCIP0874 (Yes Bank), Shop No. 58, Circular Road in front of Shri Guru Ramdass Hospital, Amritsar and on that day, Pargat Masih (petitioner) and Lovejeet Singh were on duty. It has also been alleged that on 14.3.2018, Rs. 2,16,000/- was found less and on that day, Pargat Masih and Daljit Singh were on duty and thus, total Rs. 17,51,000/- was found less in the said ATM.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely involved by compla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top