IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Hari Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
CRM-M No.2542 of 2019
Decided On : 15-07-2019
Bail - Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 21-C, Punjab Excise Act - Section 61
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for offences under the Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act and the Punjab Excise Act. The petitioner was apprehended by the police with illicit drugs in his possession.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted bail to the petitioner, considering him as a first offender and not involved in any other case, and anticipating a lengthy trial process.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of regular bail to the petitioner under the mentioned sections of the NDPS Act and the Punjab Excise Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's first-time offender status and the likelihood of a prolonged trial in granting bail.
Final Decision: The petition for regular bail was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be released on bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds.
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan. J. (Oral) - Prayer in this 2 nd petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') in FIR No. 131 dated 21.09.2017, for offence punishable under Sections 21-C of the Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'the NDPS Act ) and 61 of the Punjab Excise Act, registered at Police Station Odhan, District Sirsa.
2. The first petition was filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer that awaiting the report of the FSL, he may be granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail.
3. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after the report of the FSL has been received, the petitioner has surrendered back before the Jail Authorities and therefore, he has moved the second petition for grant of regular bail.
4. Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that as per the allegations in the FIR, the police party was present on Banwala Road area, village Khaishergarh in search of suspected persons and noticed that a Honda City car bearing registration No.DL2-FFU-0052 coming towards them. The Investigating Officer, ASI Kheta Ram signaled the same to stop and the driver of the car after stopping the same, tried to run away and the other person, whose name is Hari Singh i.e. the present petitioner, also tried to run away from the spot, however, both of them were apprehended by the police party. The Investigating Officer gave them a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act for giving an option to be searched before the Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Upon which, both of them reposed confidence with the same Investigating Officer. Thereafter, upon search of the car, 80 strips of Alprazolam tablets in bag and 75 strips of Alprazolam tablets (both containing 10 tablets each) were recovered. In the later part of the FIR, it is stated that when the petitioner Hari Singh was running towards cotton fields, he injured his left knee.
5. Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon FIR No. 143 dated 24.10.2017, which was registered at the same Police Station Odhan District Sirsa, under Sections 323, 34, 341 IPC, on the complaint of the petitioner wherein it is stated that at about 11.30 p.m., he had started traveling in the car driven by some unknown person and the co-accused Anil son of Rashpal was sitting on the back seat and in the meantime, a liquor contractors Bolero car, hit the car from the back side and thereafter, some persons named in the FIR came down and caused injuries to the petitioner and in that process, he suffered injury on his left knee and thereafter, the police came at the spot and recovered 18 cartons of liquor and intoxicant tablets.
6. On 21.05.2019, the following order was passed by this Court, directing the Investigating Officer to file an affidavit:-
"During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon FIR No. 143 dated 24.10.2017, which was registered on the statement of petitioner Hari Singh, wherein he has stated that on 20.09.2017 i.e. the day, when the FIR, in which he is praying for bail, at about 11.30 p.m., he was going in his Honda City car bearing registration No.DL-2FFU-0052 and some persons, who are the henchmen of liquor contractor, stopped his car and gave him beatings and thereafter, the police was informed and the police effected recovery of illicit liquor and narcotic tablets. It is submitted that all these facts have not been noticed in the present FIR, though the said incident was prior in time, as when the police arrested the petitioner and co-accused Anil, the said incident had already taken place, whereas the present FIR was registered much later.
Learned State counsel seeks some time to verify this fact and inform this Court by way of filing an affidavit of the Investigating Officer.
List again on 29.05.2019."
7. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to para 6 of the affidavit wherein it is stated that initially, a DDR No.32 dated 23.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.