SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2227

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Komal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sudha Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh. J. - Defendant is in Regular Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below in a suit for possession with consequential relief of injunction.

2. Plaintiff Smt. Sudha Rani filed a suit for possession on the basis of title of the property marked by letters 'ABCD' and 'CDEF' in the site plan attached with the plaint. Permanent injunction was also sought restraining the defendants No.1 to 2 and 4 from raising further construction and from alienating the suit property.

3. Plaintiff pleaded that the suit land was purchased from Ved Ram vide registered sale deed dated 11.04.1994 and she was put in possession of the suit property on 21.04.1994 by the aforesaid Ved Ram. Taking undue benefit of her absence, defendant No.1 illegally took possession of the plot in question i.e. marked by letters 'ABCD' in the site plan and also raised illegal construction. Defendant No.2 occupied the portion marked by letters 'CDFE' as shown in the site plan in an illegal manner. Plaintiff came to know about illegal construction by defendants No.1 and 2 on 10.09.2007.

4. Defendant No.1 took the stand that the plaintiff had entered into an agreemen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top